Heritage Cases

THIS IS THE ARCHIVE FOR SAHRIS 1.0


THIS SITE IS NOW AN ARCHIVE AND IS NOT SUITABLE FOR MAKING APPLICATIONS

Please be aware that no content and application creation or changes to information on this version of SAHRIS will be retained.

To make applications or utilise SAHRIS for the creation of information, please use the new site:

https://sahris.org.za

Changes to SAHRIS!

The South African Heritage Resources Information System (SAHRIS) has undergone a generational upgrade and restructure. These changes to the site include, but are not limited to:

  • A new & modernised look and layout
  • Improved site usage flows with respect to applications and content creation
  • Improved site performance and stability

Launch for the new version of SAHRIS occurred on Monday the 30th of October 2023.

The new site can be found here:

SAHRIS | SAHRIS

SAHRA Application Closure

Please note the following concerning applications submitted to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA) during the December 2023 to January 2024 period.

The full notice is available here: Notice

Special Notice

Following comments received on the proposed Revised Schedule of Fees for applications made to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA), made in terms of Section 25(2)(l) of the National Heritage Resources Act No. 25 of 1999 (NHRA) and published in the Government Gazette of 22 July 2022, SAHRA hereby publishes the final Revised Schedule of Fees for Applications made to SAHRA. Applications for provision of services submitted to the South African Heritage Resources Authority (SAHRA), in terms of the National Heritage Resources Act, No. 25 of 1999 (NHRA) must be accompanied by a payment of the appropriate fee, taking effect from 1 January 2023

Revised Schedule of Fees for Applications made to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA)

Excavation and alternation to facilitate adequate drainage of Cape Stores, Parliament.

CaseViews

CaseHeader

HeritageAuthority(s): 

Case Type: 

ProposalDescription: 

The basement of Parliament, an important area where records are kept has been subject to flooding due to inadequate drainage. It is necessary to undertake excavation and construction works to rehabilitate existing and create new drainage to alleviate this situation. The erf involved is erf 95165 as well as an underground drainage canal for which there is no erf no.

Expanded_Motivation: 

Motivation for alterations with Parliamentary precinct, Cape Town: drainage issues. Introduction Mr Johan de Lange of BVI engineering has requested that ACO prepare an application for a permit to be submitted to SAHRA for trenching and alterations to an historic drain within the grounds of the Houses of Parliament (erf 95165). The area in question is the old Assembly Building at the north east end adjacent to Government Avenue. The problem at hand relates to the fact that the basement of the building which was built in the early 20th century is subject to damp and flooding which is having a slow but detrimental effect on the basement floor and ceiling. This area is used as an archive (Cape Stores) and is obviously in an unsatisfactory condition. The proposal is to install a system of drainage to evacuate the excess ground water. This will involve dehumidifying the basement and installing pumps and a drainage system to take the water to the nearest storm water system (quite some distance) or discharge it into a large manhole that exists in the Parliament garden which is closer than the nearest storm water drain. The large manhole in question is an access point to the start of the Adderley Street vaulted drainage tunnel built under British governance in the 19th century. The best engineering solution is to modify the vaulted drain to accommodate a discharge point so that excess water can be evacuated through the vaulted drain to its discharge point at the harbour. Background to the historic drains of Cape Town The VOC were attracted to Table Bay because of the “Mountain Streams” – Platteklip, Devils Peak (Capel) and relevant to this project, the Varsche River. The VOC used these as the city’s water supply by at first building a canal to divert water to Waggenaar’s Dam followed by a formal canal building program that is reflected in the Street names – Heerengracht, Buitengracht, Kaisersgraght. Typically these canals were about 3 m deep and 4 m wide, stone lined and capable of accommodating flood water (see Hart and Dewar 2007: Report on archaeological investigation of the Canals at the grand Parade erf 4651 for the city of Cape Town and Cape Town partnership). The Varsche River was very important as it was perennial. Fed from numerous springs on the lower slopes of Table Mountain (Breda Park, Waterhof, Leeuwenhof) it was reliable and became the main source of irrigation in the company garden, after which it flowed down the Heerengracht providing water for the residents of the City and discharging floodwater to Table Bay. Unfortunately the canals were not were maintained, became polluted and rancid in the dry season which prompted the British colonial rulers to dispose of them by filling them in. The Varsche River which ran down Government Avenue was diverted into a brick barrel drain down the centre of Adderley Street. These very large brick drains are engineering marvels in their own right and are now used for the conducting of formal tours under the city. By 1862 the Varsche River Canal is still discernible on the Snow survey of 1862 running down Government Avenue. Shortly after that it was diverted into a brick drain. A very small portion of the original canal is still visible at the Company Garden gate to the Tuinhuis. Proposed activity The proposed activity is the installation of a drainage system and digging of a trench along the side of the old Assembly Building to the start of the Adderley Street brick drain. The groundwater will be pumped from the basement and discharged via a buried pipeline to the brick drain inspection chamber in the Parliament Gardens. Some alteration of fabric will be necessary in the Parliament basement and also at the point of discharge where alteration and breaking through of the inspection chamber is required. Possible impacts • Some intervention in original fabric in basement of Parliament and at entry to brick drain chamber. • Low chance of archaeological impacts along drain trench (monitoring should be considered). • Low chance of accidental impacts to ornamental Parliamentary boundary wall along Government Avenue (care required, shoring installed and in event of damage appropriate repair that is true to form. Recommendation In balance the remedial action is necessary and far outweighs the significance of possible impacts.

ApplicationDate: 

Monday, June 3, 2019 - 16:35

CaseID: 

13920

OtherReferences: 

Heritage Reports: 

ReferenceList: 

 
 

Search form