Heritage Cases

THIS IS THE ARCHIVE FOR SAHRIS 1.0


THIS SITE IS NOW AN ARCHIVE AND IS NOT SUITABLE FOR MAKING APPLICATIONS

Please be aware that no content and application creation or changes to information on this version of SAHRIS will be retained.

To make applications or utilise SAHRIS for the creation of information, please use the new site:

https://sahris.org.za

Changes to SAHRIS!

The South African Heritage Resources Information System (SAHRIS) has undergone a generational upgrade and restructure. These changes to the site include, but are not limited to:

  • A new & modernised look and layout
  • Improved site usage flows with respect to applications and content creation
  • Improved site performance and stability

Launch for the new version of SAHRIS occurred on Monday the 30th of October 2023.

The new site can be found here:

SAHRIS | SAHRIS

SAHRA Application Closure

Please note the following concerning applications submitted to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA) during the December 2023 to January 2024 period.

The full notice is available here: Notice

Special Notice

Following comments received on the proposed Revised Schedule of Fees for applications made to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA), made in terms of Section 25(2)(l) of the National Heritage Resources Act No. 25 of 1999 (NHRA) and published in the Government Gazette of 22 July 2022, SAHRA hereby publishes the final Revised Schedule of Fees for Applications made to SAHRA. Applications for provision of services submitted to the South African Heritage Resources Authority (SAHRA), in terms of the National Heritage Resources Act, No. 25 of 1999 (NHRA) must be accompanied by a payment of the appropriate fee, taking effect from 1 January 2023

Revised Schedule of Fees for Applications made to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA)

Heritage Management - KhoiSan History and Heritage - The Griquas (Khoe)

CaseViews

CaseHeader

Status: 

HeritageAuthority(s): 

Case Type: 

ProposalDescription: 

It is argued that the current dominant neo-Imperialist heritage ideology is disadvantageous to some South African culture groups—the Griqua, a Khoe KhoiSan people, being the case at hand. Fervent neo-Imperialist ideological support from both academia and the public sector, based on its perceived restitutive and inclusive qualities, is evidenced by staunch resistance to anyone opposing the ideology. But the neo-Imperialist idiom—like its predecessor, Imperialism—is underscored by missionary inspired cultural and historical constructs of the British Colonial Period when it was used by the then Cape government for socio-political purposes. These histories are often contrary to and promoted at the expense of impartial heritage research. Calls by KhoiSan groups—including Griqua sections—for a more holistic, integrated, and peoples centred approach to their histories have, to date, largely been ignored. Popular and publicly available Griqua history centres on a seventeenth to eighteenth century mixed-race origin of them between indigenous Khoe and White settler groups at the Cape. But this version of history is contrary to that held by many Griquas, and at least some heritage specialists. Cavazzi and Labat (1732) describe a Giaques homeland cited in the Congo / provincial regions of the Kingdom of Monoemugi, that was invaded and conquered between the years 1491–1592. They follow a subjugated and incorporated section of the Giaques—the Giaques Cassange—to Angola, where they subsequently settled with their original conquerors, the Muzimba / Chilomba. In 1648 the Giaques Cassange and other culture groups were consulted by appointed Portuguese ambassadors in an attempt to bring them into the Christian fold. The history thus recorded leaves to question the fate of Giaques / Griquas survivors of the said Muzimba, and inferred later disputes and conquests, and with direct reference to the Giaques ou Galles / Galies recorded residing toward the north-east of the greater Okavango region by Pierre du Val, Cafrerie et Monomtapa, circa. 1663. The above-mentioned alludes to a fairly recent and reasonably reconstructable Griqua history; it, however, designates the Giaques / Griquas as a people with an origin northward of South Africa and is, thus, directly contrary to the Imperialist and neo-Imperialist constructs of Griqua history. It is suggested that the South African Griqua are the descendants of displaced survivors of possibly various invasive wars further north in Africa, starting with the Muzimba conquest of their homeland; expulsed and dispossessed Giaques / Griquas fled mainly southward and south-westward, where they were encountered by the missionaries, residing in and near the Cape Colony’s interior border regions in the nineteenth century. South African Griquas, at present, mainly reside in the Northern, Western, and Eastern Cape provinces. The post-1994 democratic emphasis on the neo-Imperialist ideology resulted in the Griqua being denied investigation into and access to their more distant history, negatively impacting not only on their heritage but also their human rights. It is, thus, requested that SAHRA / the relevant provincial heritage resources authorities (PHRAs) initiate(s) an impartial research program into their history to afford them their rightful place in the broader southern African historical and heritage cultural arenas.

ApplicationDate: 

Monday, May 8, 2023 - 12:28

CaseID: 

21257

OtherReferences: 

ReferenceList: 

 
 

Search form