Heritage Cases

THIS IS THE ARCHIVE FOR SAHRIS 1.0


THIS SITE IS NOW AN ARCHIVE AND IS NOT SUITABLE FOR MAKING APPLICATIONS

Please be aware that no content and application creation or changes to information on this version of SAHRIS will be retained.

To make applications or utilise SAHRIS for the creation of information, please use the new site:

https://sahris.org.za

Changes to SAHRIS!

The South African Heritage Resources Information System (SAHRIS) has undergone a generational upgrade and restructure. These changes to the site include, but are not limited to:

  • A new & modernised look and layout
  • Improved site usage flows with respect to applications and content creation
  • Improved site performance and stability

Launch for the new version of SAHRIS occurred on Monday the 30th of October 2023.

The new site can be found here:

SAHRIS | SAHRIS

SAHRA Application Closure

Please note the following concerning applications submitted to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA) during the December 2023 to January 2024 period.

The full notice is available here: Notice

Special Notice

Following comments received on the proposed Revised Schedule of Fees for applications made to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA), made in terms of Section 25(2)(l) of the National Heritage Resources Act No. 25 of 1999 (NHRA) and published in the Government Gazette of 22 July 2022, SAHRA hereby publishes the final Revised Schedule of Fees for Applications made to SAHRA. Applications for provision of services submitted to the South African Heritage Resources Authority (SAHRA), in terms of the National Heritage Resources Act, No. 25 of 1999 (NHRA) must be accompanied by a payment of the appropriate fee, taking effect from 1 January 2023

Revised Schedule of Fees for Applications made to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA)

Mulilo De Aar PV EA Validity Extension

CaseViews

CaseHeader

Status: 

HeritageAuthority(s): 

Development Type: 

ProposalDescription: 

Mulilo De Aar PV EA Validity Extension, near De Aar in the Northern Cape

Expanded_Motivation: 

The very comprehensive Statement Letter concluded as follows: Conclusion Based on the above review the following conclusions can be drawn: 1. The baseline environment for archaeology and palaeontology has not changed since 2012; 2. The baseline environment for the cultural landscape is of lesser quality than it was in 2012; 3. The impact assessment ratings provided in 2012 remain valid today; 4. Some mitigation measures have been complied with (i.e. areas to be avoided have been avoided through layout design), while others remain applicable and have been included in the project EMPr; 5. No new mitigation measures are required; and 6. The existing MTHS project layout as approved is sensitive to heritage resources in that all known significant heritage sites have been avoided. The layout is therefore still appropriate in heritage terms. Reasoned opinion Based on the reviews of individual and cumulative impacts above, it is the opinion of the heritage specialist that the proposed De Aar PV facility should be allowed to proceed and that the amended EA should be issued. Recommendations The heritage environment has not changed significantly since 2012; therefore, there is no objection to the extension of the validity of the Environmental Authorisation. Given that previous conditions have either been complied with or included in the EMPr, no new conditions are required.

ApplicationDate: 

Monday, July 11, 2022 - 14:19

CaseID: 

19027

OtherReferences: 

ReferenceList: 

 
 

Search form