Heritage Cases

THIS IS THE ARCHIVE FOR SAHRIS 1.0


THIS SITE IS NOW AN ARCHIVE AND IS NOT SUITABLE FOR MAKING APPLICATIONS

Please be aware that no content and application creation or changes to information on this version of SAHRIS will be retained.

To make applications or utilise SAHRIS for the creation of information, please use the new site:

https://sahris.org.za

Changes to SAHRIS!

The South African Heritage Resources Information System (SAHRIS) has undergone a generational upgrade and restructure. These changes to the site include, but are not limited to:

  • A new & modernised look and layout
  • Improved site usage flows with respect to applications and content creation
  • Improved site performance and stability

Launch for the new version of SAHRIS occurred on Monday the 30th of October 2023.

The new site can be found here:

SAHRIS | SAHRIS

SAHRA Application Closure

Please note the following concerning applications submitted to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA) during the December 2023 to January 2024 period.

The full notice is available here: Notice

Special Notice

Following comments received on the proposed Revised Schedule of Fees for applications made to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA), made in terms of Section 25(2)(l) of the National Heritage Resources Act No. 25 of 1999 (NHRA) and published in the Government Gazette of 22 July 2022, SAHRA hereby publishes the final Revised Schedule of Fees for Applications made to SAHRA. Applications for provision of services submitted to the South African Heritage Resources Authority (SAHRA), in terms of the National Heritage Resources Act, No. 25 of 1999 (NHRA) must be accompanied by a payment of the appropriate fee, taking effect from 1 January 2023

Revised Schedule of Fees for Applications made to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA)

PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW RIVER IN BORAKALALO VILLAGE, NORTH WEST PROVINCE

CaseViews

CaseHeader

Status: 

HeritageAuthority(s): 

Case Type: 

Development Type: 

ProposalDescription: 

The project entails the construction of a bridge connection two section of the village and upgrading of section of a streets leading to the bridge on Moilos 412-JO. The actual infrastructure of the project are: • 400m long and 15m wide internal roads • 90m long and 15m wide bridge with pedestrian walkway and safety rails. • Stormwater management infrastructure • 31 000m3 burrowpit

Expanded_Motivation: 

The aim of the proposed construction of the new river bridge is to eradicate the existing unsafe gravel road crossing through the riverbed. The new bridge will provide uninterrupted and safe access to school children and the community in general, over the river. Currently there is no existing drainage structure. Vehicles and pedestrians must cross the river at riverbed level. The riverbed is ± 5m deep at the crossing and has steep banks. The eroded banks and riverbed are most possibly symptoms of some high flood velocities. There is no exposed bedrock visible at the existing crossing position. The bridge site has always been crossing point between the Goo-Nonyane section, which hosts the churches, schools, clinic; and the Ledubana section which hosts the village cemetery and sports ground. There is therefore a need for proper access and crossing between these two sections of one village. Evidence on the ground show that people still walk across and have been doing makeshift plan like packing stones and rubble to assist crossing, but rain always washes these away while erosion makes the crossing deeper and steeper. From an overall sensitivity and planning perspective, the proposed construction supports the broader strategic context of the municipality and is in line with broader societal needs and the public interest. No exceedance of social, ecological or heritage limits will result from the construction of the proposed bridge and it associated infrastructures, and no significant disturbance of biological diversity is anticipated, as detailed in this Basic Assessment Report. For the two years prior the municipality failed to implemented MIG allocations as awarded to the municipality for upgrading of streets from gravel to tar or paving. Delay in procurement process impacted negatively for implementation of the MIG Projects. The implementation of storm water projects is not possible due to the costs as per MIG standards, thus the roads also serves as the storm water channels.

ApplicationDate: 

Saturday, August 22, 2020 - 10:57

CaseID: 

15418

OtherReferences: 

CaseReferenceDepartmentApplicationTypeDeadlineDateContactPersonFinalDecision
NW/EIA/21/2020
30/09/2020

ReferenceList: 

Images
Brdige site
Bridge site
 
 

Search form