Heritage Cases

THIS IS THE ARCHIVE FOR SAHRIS 1.0


THIS SITE IS NOW AN ARCHIVE AND IS NOT SUITABLE FOR MAKING APPLICATIONS

Please be aware that no content and application creation or changes to information on this version of SAHRIS will be retained.

To make applications or utilise SAHRIS for the creation of information, please use the new site:

https://sahris.org.za

Changes to SAHRIS!

The South African Heritage Resources Information System (SAHRIS) has undergone a generational upgrade and restructure. These changes to the site include, but are not limited to:

  • A new & modernised look and layout
  • Improved site usage flows with respect to applications and content creation
  • Improved site performance and stability

Launch for the new version of SAHRIS occurred on Monday the 30th of October 2023.

The new site can be found here:

SAHRIS | SAHRIS

SAHRA Application Closure

Please note the following concerning applications submitted to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA) during the December 2023 to January 2024 period.

The full notice is available here: Notice

Special Notice

Following comments received on the proposed Revised Schedule of Fees for applications made to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA), made in terms of Section 25(2)(l) of the National Heritage Resources Act No. 25 of 1999 (NHRA) and published in the Government Gazette of 22 July 2022, SAHRA hereby publishes the final Revised Schedule of Fees for Applications made to SAHRA. Applications for provision of services submitted to the South African Heritage Resources Authority (SAHRA), in terms of the National Heritage Resources Act, No. 25 of 1999 (NHRA) must be accompanied by a payment of the appropriate fee, taking effect from 1 January 2023

Revised Schedule of Fees for Applications made to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA)

SIB-ZOOMS

CaseViews

CaseHeader

HeritageAuthority(s): 

Case Type: 

ProposalDescription: 

The project plans to sample fragmentary, non-identifiable faunal remains (<3 cm; non-human) from the Middle Stone Age site of Sibhudu for paleoproteomic analyses. Key goals of the projects are to check for the existence of ancient proteins in the archaeological layers and identify the fragmentary bones by genus/species. The pilot study would export n=500 fragments to the cutting-edge paleoproteomic facilities at Tübingen University. Province: KwaZulu-Natal.

Expanded_Motivation: 

The project plans to sample fragmentary, non-identifiable faunal remains (<3 cm; non-human) from the Middle Stone Age site of Sibhudu for paleoproteomic analyses. Tübingen University has recently built-up a cutting-edge paleoprotemics laboratory run by Dr. Samantha Brown who will conduct all analyses. Studies with these methods and laboratory setup require the bones to be exported to Tübingen (see e.g., Brown et al. 2021; Janzen et al. 2021). The paleoproteomics facilities at Tübingen are part of the zooarchaeological department which is directed by Prof. N. Conard, current permit holder of the Sibhudu excavations. The key objectives of this pilot study are threefold: 1) find out whether ancient proteins have survived in the faunal assemblages over the last 40.000-80.000 years before today; 2) examine the differential preservation of ancient proteins across different archaeological layers and taphonomic regimes of the site; 3) identify the fragmentary faunal remains by genus and species, which is impossible from these remains by classic macroscopic zooarchaeological methods. This will be the first time that the ZooMS (see below) will be applied to Middle Stone Age faunal remains and the site of Sibhudu, providing not just novel scientific insights but also potential new ways of analyses for Stone Age remains across southern Africa if successful. In terms of materials and methods, the pilot study would be based on n=500 fragments which will be sampled from the entire culture-stratigraphic sequence of Sibhudu (n=100 each from: Sibudan, HP, SB, “pre-SB Wadley”, “pre-SB Conard”). Only non-identifiable bone fragments <3 cm will be used, which have already been weighted, counted and entered in the Sibhudu database, but have no further intrinsic scientific value (i.e., they cannot be identified to species/genus by classic zooarchaeological methods). All of these bone fragments are currently stored in bulk by excavated bucket (incl. information on stratigraphic unit and weight) in the KwaZulu-Natal Museum in Pietermaritzburg. The 500 bone fragments will be hand-carried to Tübingen (Germany) by Dr. Manuel Will (Co-PI of the current research grant to excavate Sibhudu) and will be returned to South Africa after the analyses are finished (i.e., in February 2023). These bones will be analysed using a paleoproteomic technique called ZooMS (Zooarchaeology by Mass Spectrometry). ZooMS allows for the taxonomic identification of bone owing to the small differences in the amino acid sequences of collagen between species (e.g. Brown et al. 2021; Janzen et al. 2021). 20mg subsamples will be taken from each of the fragmented bones for analysis. Subsamples are taken using a microdrill with care taken to avoid any diagnostic features on the bone. Preferably, a small bone chip is removed rather than powdering the sample as powdering can sometimes lead to collagen loss. Drilling is kept as minimal as possible however a small hole/mark will be present on the bone after drilling is complete (damaging but not destroying the bone fragment in the process). Collagen is extracted from the subsample by first demineralising the bone and then using heat to gelatinise the collagen. Once extracted, the collagen chains will be enzymatically digested into their smaller peptides and these will be measured using a MALDI-TOF MS (matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometer). We then match each of the collagen peptides identified in a sample to a reference library which allows for the taxonomic identification of the collagen sample. The method is highly time and cost efficient allowing us to run fairly large assemblages of bone fragments within a relatively short time period, making this the ideal technique to assess biomolecular preservation at Sibhudu and to taxonomically identify the highly fragmented assemblage.

ApplicationDate: 

Thursday, November 18, 2021 - 15:55

CaseID: 

17573

OtherReferences: 

ReferenceList: 

CitationReferenceTypeDate Retrieved
Brown, S., Wang, N., Oertle, A., Kozlikin, M.B., Shunkov, M.V., Derevianko, A.P., Comeskey, D., Jope-Street, B., Harvey, V.L., Chowdhury, M.P., Buckley, M., Higham, T., Douka, K., 2021. Zooarchaeology through the lens of collagen fingerprinting at Denisova Cave. Sci. Rep. 11, 15457.
Tuesday, November 30, 2021
Janzen, A., Richter, K.K., Mwebi, O., Brown, S., Onduso, V., Gatwiri, F., Ndiema, E., Katongo, M., Goldstein, S.T., Douka, K., Boivin, N., 2021. Distinguishing African bovids using Zooarchaeology by Mass Spectrometry (ZooMS): New peptide markers and insights into Iron Age economies in Zambia. PLoS One 16, e0251061.
Tuesday, November 30, 2021
 
 

Search form