Heritage Cases

THIS IS THE ARCHIVE FOR SAHRIS 1.0


THIS SITE IS NOW AN ARCHIVE AND IS NOT SUITABLE FOR MAKING APPLICATIONS

Please be aware that no content and application creation or changes to information on this version of SAHRIS will be retained.

To make applications or utilise SAHRIS for the creation of information, please use the new site:

https://sahris.org.za

Changes to SAHRIS!

The South African Heritage Resources Information System (SAHRIS) has undergone a generational upgrade and restructure. These changes to the site include, but are not limited to:

  • A new & modernised look and layout
  • Improved site usage flows with respect to applications and content creation
  • Improved site performance and stability

Launch for the new version of SAHRIS occurred on Monday the 30th of October 2023.

The new site can be found here:

SAHRIS | SAHRIS

SAHRA Application Closure

Please note the following concerning applications submitted to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA) during the December 2023 to January 2024 period.

The full notice is available here: Notice

Special Notice

Following comments received on the proposed Revised Schedule of Fees for applications made to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA), made in terms of Section 25(2)(l) of the National Heritage Resources Act No. 25 of 1999 (NHRA) and published in the Government Gazette of 22 July 2022, SAHRA hereby publishes the final Revised Schedule of Fees for Applications made to SAHRA. Applications for provision of services submitted to the South African Heritage Resources Authority (SAHRA), in terms of the National Heritage Resources Act, No. 25 of 1999 (NHRA) must be accompanied by a payment of the appropriate fee, taking effect from 1 January 2023

Revised Schedule of Fees for Applications made to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA)

Archaeological Mitigation for Phezukomoya WEF on farm Kleinfontein RE117

CaseViews

CaseHeader

HeritageAuthority(s): 

Case Type: 

Development Type: 

ProposalDescription: 

The mitigation of two archaeological sites - a historical midden (KFT001) and a LSA lithic scatter (KFT002) that will be impacted by the construction of the Phezukomoya WEF

Expanded_Motivation: 

EDF Renewables are developing the authorised Phezukomoya Wind Energy Facility (WEF) on a number of farms east and south of Noupoort (Figure 1). The WEF has been subject to two archaeological assessments: in 2017 as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment process (Hart et al, 2017a) and in 2019 as part of a Part 2 EA Amendment Application when the authorised WEF was split into two: the Phezukomoya and Hartebeesthoek West WEFs (Gribble & Euston-Brown, 2019a). More recently ACO Associates was commissioned to undertake the pre-construction survey required as a condition (No. 37, 38 and 138) of the Environmental Authorisation for the WEF issued in October 2021. The aim of the survey was to ground truth the authorised wind turbine generator (WTG) positions, internal WEF cable and roads alignments, substation sites, laydown areas, etc., to identify heritage resources which may be impacted by the construction, operation and decommissioning of the WEF, to assess their significance and provide recommendations for mitigation that can be incorporated into the project Environmental Management Programme. The walkdown survey (Gribble & Euston-Brown, 2022) identified two sites that will be impacted by the construction of an access road for the WEF: - KFT001 is a historical ashheap or midden, probably associated with the nearby Kleinfontein farm complex measuring approximately 30 x 7 m in extent and with a possible depth of deposit of about 20 cm. The site is heavily bioturbated by ground squirrels but is rich in bone, mid- to late19th century ceramics, glass, metal (Figure 3, Plate 1 - Plate 3). - KFT002 is a large and dense scatter of LSA lithics in erosion gullies and on sheetwash on a slope below a shale outcrop. Visible in area of approximately 80 x 150 m, the lithics include substantial numbers of endscrapers typical of the both the Lockshoek and Smithfield (Figure 4, Plate 4 - Plate 6). Gribble & Euston-Brown (2022) recommended that both sites should be sampled by a professional archaeologist prior to the commencement of construction work.

ApplicationDate: 

Monday, September 12, 2022 - 08:59

CaseID: 

19528

OtherReferences: 

DepartmentApplicationTypeDeadlineDate
22/09/2022

ReferenceList: 

Images
View across site to north-east
View across site to south-west
 
 

Search form