Heritage Cases

THIS IS THE ARCHIVE FOR SAHRIS 1.0


THIS SITE IS NOW AN ARCHIVE AND IS NOT SUITABLE FOR MAKING APPLICATIONS

Please be aware that no content and application creation or changes to information on this version of SAHRIS will be retained.

To make applications or utilise SAHRIS for the creation of information, please use the new site:

https://sahris.org.za

Changes to SAHRIS!

The South African Heritage Resources Information System (SAHRIS) has undergone a generational upgrade and restructure. These changes to the site include, but are not limited to:

  • A new & modernised look and layout
  • Improved site usage flows with respect to applications and content creation
  • Improved site performance and stability

Launch for the new version of SAHRIS occurred on Monday the 30th of October 2023.

The new site can be found here:

SAHRIS | SAHRIS

SAHRA Application Closure

Please note the following concerning applications submitted to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA) during the December 2023 to January 2024 period.

The full notice is available here: Notice

Special Notice

Following comments received on the proposed Revised Schedule of Fees for applications made to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA), made in terms of Section 25(2)(l) of the National Heritage Resources Act No. 25 of 1999 (NHRA) and published in the Government Gazette of 22 July 2022, SAHRA hereby publishes the final Revised Schedule of Fees for Applications made to SAHRA. Applications for provision of services submitted to the South African Heritage Resources Authority (SAHRA), in terms of the National Heritage Resources Act, No. 25 of 1999 (NHRA) must be accompanied by a payment of the appropriate fee, taking effect from 1 January 2023

Revised Schedule of Fees for Applications made to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA)

Dating Early Acheulean in Member 5 West at Sterkfontein

CaseViews

CaseHeader

HeritageAuthority(s): 

Case Type: 

ProposalDescription: 

We here apply to send seven natural chert samples from the Early Acheulean Member 5 West deposit at Sterkfontein to Prof Darryl Granger at Purdue University in the USA, to be dated at the PRIME Lab facility. I will send the samples by international courier.

Expanded_Motivation: 

Currently the only working age estimates for the Early Acheulean deposit at Sterkfontein is a faunal date of less than 2 Ma published by Vrba (see Kuman and Clarke 2000 for discussion). Debates based on palaeomagnetic readings and on ESR results have been published, with claims for younger ages of the deposit (e.g., Herries and Shaw 2011). However, these methods do not work well for Sterkfontein and are controversial. And flowstones do not date the actual breccias, because at Sterkfontein many of these are calcite infills that fill voids in breccia, and these are spaces created by subsidence of the breccia. Capping flowstones over deposits also can only provide a minimum age. We have, however, had good success in dating two older members at Sterkfontein using the isochron method of cosmogenic nuclide burial dating (Granger et al. 2015). We here apply to send seven natural chert samples from the Early Acheulean Member 5 West deposit at Sterkfontein to Prof Darryl Granger at Purdue University in the USA, to be dated at the PRIME Lab facility. The advantage of the isochron method is that multiple samples from the same burial depth all share the same post-burial production history. This shared burial history and the differences in the samples’ inherited 26Al and 10Be concentrations allow for the calculation of post-burial production without requiring any assumptions about burial depth or history. In the single sample method, these unknowns must be modelled, which adds to increased uncertainty. Outliers reflecting either sample or reworking problems can also be identified with the isochron method. These seven chert samples were personally selected by Granger during a visit to the site in April this year (but now funds are available for the dating, and hence this application). The samples were selected from the natural rocks retrieved during excavation of the Acheulean deposit and stored at the site laboratory. Samples were specifically selected as items that entered the cave from external sediments, because they need to have been exposed at surface prior to deposit in cave. Adequate shielding from further nuclide production is judged to have occurred for these samples. They are in close association with the Acheulean tools and fauna in this deposit. The sample provenances are as follows: 4 chert samples from Square P/64, 15'0" to 15'7" depth. 3 chert samples from Square Q/63, 15'0" to 16'0" depth. These samples will provide the best dating for Sterkfontein Caves Early Acheulean infill in Member 5 West, Gauteng Province, Cradle of Humankind World Heritage Site. T

ApplicationDate: 

Wednesday, December 12, 2018 - 11:43

CaseID: 

13318

OtherReferences: 

ReferenceList: 

CitationReferenceType
Granger, D.E., R.J. Gibbon, K. Kuman, R.J. Clarke, L. Bruxelles and M.W. Caffee (2015). New cosmogenic burial ages for Sterkfontein Member 2 Australopithecus and Member 5 Oldowan. Nature 522, 85-88.
Kuman, K. and R.J. Clarke (2000). Stratigraphy, artefact industries and hominid associations for Sterkfontein, Member 5. Journal of Human Evolution 38:,827-847.
Herries, A. I. R. & Shaw, J. (2011). Paleomagnetic analysis of the Sterkfontein paleocave deposits: implications for the age of the hominin fossils and stone tool industries. Journal of Human Evolution 60, 523–539.
 
 

Search form