Heritage Cases

THIS IS THE ARCHIVE FOR SAHRIS 1.0


THIS SITE IS NOW AN ARCHIVE AND IS NOT SUITABLE FOR MAKING APPLICATIONS

Please be aware that no content and application creation or changes to information on this version of SAHRIS will be retained.

To make applications or utilise SAHRIS for the creation of information, please use the new site:

https://sahris.org.za

Changes to SAHRIS!

The South African Heritage Resources Information System (SAHRIS) has undergone a generational upgrade and restructure. These changes to the site include, but are not limited to:

  • A new & modernised look and layout
  • Improved site usage flows with respect to applications and content creation
  • Improved site performance and stability

Launch for the new version of SAHRIS occurred on Monday the 30th of October 2023.

The new site can be found here:

SAHRIS | SAHRIS

SAHRA Application Closure

Please note the following concerning applications submitted to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA) during the December 2023 to January 2024 period.

The full notice is available here: Notice

Special Notice

Following comments received on the proposed Revised Schedule of Fees for applications made to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA), made in terms of Section 25(2)(l) of the National Heritage Resources Act No. 25 of 1999 (NHRA) and published in the Government Gazette of 22 July 2022, SAHRA hereby publishes the final Revised Schedule of Fees for Applications made to SAHRA. Applications for provision of services submitted to the South African Heritage Resources Authority (SAHRA), in terms of the National Heritage Resources Act, No. 25 of 1999 (NHRA) must be accompanied by a payment of the appropriate fee, taking effect from 1 January 2023

Revised Schedule of Fees for Applications made to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA)

Permit Application for Destructive Sampling and Analysis of the Hanging Remnant Stratigraphic Unit at Swartkrans Cave, South Africa

CaseViews

CaseHeader

HeritageAuthority(s): 

Case Type: 

ProposalDescription: 

The Member 1 sedimentary infill at Swartkrans is comprised of two, chronologically distinct units, the Lower Bank and the Hanging Remnant (HR). The HR deposit has been suggested as being younger than the Lower Bank, although attempts at dating it have either relied on inferences from faunal assemblages or bounding flowstones (see Pickering et al. 2011). Recently, Kuman et al. (2021) have used cosmogenic nuclide dating to produce an age for the Lower Bank at ~2.2 Ma, which is coherent with past uranium series and cosmogenic dating results (Pickering et al. 2011; Gibbon et al. 2009). To build upon our chronological research of the Member 1 sedimentary unit, we proposed to use previously collected samples (permit# 2598) of natural chert and quartz clasts (non-artefactual), along with breccia debris to date the HR. Results will test the hypothesis that the HR is in fact younger than the Lower Bank and provide much needed insight into the accumulation history of the Member 1 infill at Swartkrans.

Expanded_Motivation: 

The HR despoit at Swartkrans Cave has yielded some of the most iconic specimens of Paranthropus robustus fossils, including the complete SK48 skull, as well as SK15, which is the first recorded instance of early Homo coexisting alongside P. robustus (Brain, 1993). In fact, the Hanging Remnant has yielded the largest collection of P. robustus in southern Africa (Grine, 1993). Despite the significance of its fossil collections, the Hanging Remnant has never been directly dated, which is thought to be younger than the Lower Bank, the latter now dated to ~2.2 Ma (Kuman et al. 2021). Currently, age estimates based on faunal biochronology place the Hanging Remnant around ~1.9 to ~1.8 Ma (Brain, 1993; Pickering et al. 2011). Morphological comparisons with Drimolen have suggested difference in craniodental features with the Hanging Remnant sample of P. robustus (Martin et al. 2021). This has been suggested to reflect microevolutionary changes through time, albeit this argument is reliant on difference in chronology (i.e. Drimolen Main Quarry is older than Swartkrans Hanging Remnant). As such, developing a chronology specifically for the Hanging Remnant has important implications for understanding the evolutionary history of P. robustus in southern Africa. Furthermore, in 2018 we identified a hard breccia mass from the HR in the northwestern portion of Swartkrans, which was subsequently excavated (Fig. 1). We used a total station to map the Hanging Remnant mass, as well as produced a photogrammetry model before and after its excavation. We first sectioned this mass into smaller blocks that were removed through exploiting natural cracks. We then mapped outlines with the total station of the blocks before after their removal from the Hanging Remnant mass. Well-preserved fossils were recovered, which currently under study by T. Pickering and R. Clarke. The faunal remains are encased in hard breccia (i.e. consolidated) and being prepared in the Sterkfontein shed by Andrew Phashwana, who has 20 years of experience in fossil preparation and excavation. We have collected six chert and one quartz clasts from ‘block 5’ of the HR mass and we therefore propose to use cosmogenic nuclide dating techniques to produce a complete chronology for the Member 1 sedimentary unit at Swartkrans. We also have collected sediment samples of the breccia itself to calibrate the results of cosmogenic nuclide dates. A total of 60 total station points captured the outline of block 5, which define the spatial provenance of the chert and brecciated sediment samples.

ApplicationDate: 

Wednesday, August 4, 2021 - 11:49

CaseID: 

16910

OtherReferences: 

ReferenceList: 

 
 

Search form