Heritage Cases

THIS IS THE ARCHIVE FOR SAHRIS 1.0


THIS SITE IS NOW AN ARCHIVE AND IS NOT SUITABLE FOR MAKING APPLICATIONS

Please be aware that no content and application creation or changes to information on this version of SAHRIS will be retained.

To make applications or utilise SAHRIS for the creation of information, please use the new site:

https://sahris.org.za

Changes to SAHRIS!

The South African Heritage Resources Information System (SAHRIS) has undergone a generational upgrade and restructure. These changes to the site include, but are not limited to:

  • A new & modernised look and layout
  • Improved site usage flows with respect to applications and content creation
  • Improved site performance and stability

Launch for the new version of SAHRIS occurred on Monday the 30th of October 2023.

The new site can be found here:

SAHRIS | SAHRIS

SAHRA Application Closure

Please note the following concerning applications submitted to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA) during the December 2023 to January 2024 period.

The full notice is available here: Notice

Special Notice

Following comments received on the proposed Revised Schedule of Fees for applications made to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA), made in terms of Section 25(2)(l) of the National Heritage Resources Act No. 25 of 1999 (NHRA) and published in the Government Gazette of 22 July 2022, SAHRA hereby publishes the final Revised Schedule of Fees for Applications made to SAHRA. Applications for provision of services submitted to the South African Heritage Resources Authority (SAHRA), in terms of the National Heritage Resources Act, No. 25 of 1999 (NHRA) must be accompanied by a payment of the appropriate fee, taking effect from 1 January 2023

Revised Schedule of Fees for Applications made to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA)

U-series dating of shells from Bushman Rock Shelter

CaseViews

CaseHeader

HeritageAuthority(s): 

Case Type: 

ProposalDescription: 

We are applying for an export permit for fragments of shells (giant land snails, Achatina sp., and ostrich eggshells) from the Later and Middle Stone Age layers of Bushman Rock Shelter, Limpopo Province, in order to date them with a newly developed U-series dating methodology.

Expanded_Motivation: 

Bushman Rock Shelter, located on the edge of the Highveld in Limpopo Province, is a key Later and Middle Stone Age site, which, despite previous careful excavations conducted by Prof. Eloff in the 60’s/70’s, still lacks detailed published analyses of its archaeological content and chronological context (Porraz et al., 2015). Radiocarbon dating has demonstrated that the Later Stone Age layers document the transition from the Pleistocene to the Holocene, but the chronology of the Middle Stone Age sequence is more difficult to establish. First results of recent Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) dating (Porraz et al., in prep.) suggest that a significant chronological and sedimentary gap separates the Later Stone Age sequence from the Middle Stone Age one, the latter most likely predating MIS 4 (> 71 ka). Interestingly, the lithic industry recovered from the Middle Stone Age layers of Bushman Rock Shelter, both from previous and ongoing excavations (Porraz et al., 2015), has been attributed to the Pietersburg techno-complex. This techno-complex, poorly described and somewhat fallen into anonymity since its first description in the 50’s, has no precise chronological attribution so far. Besides Bushman Rock Shelter, several major archaeological sites south of the Limpopo River have yielded artefacts interpreted as Pietersburg (e.g. Cave of Hearths and Border Cave), but only Border Cave has been tentatively dated (Grün and Beaumont, 2001). Dating the Middle Stone Age sequence of Bushman Rock Shelter using new and accurate dating techniques therefore provides us with the opportunity to pin point, the Pietersburg industry within southern African prehistory. While luminescence dating methods are well adapted to the study of Middle Stone Age sequences because of the time range covered and the quasi ubiquity, in archaeological deposits, of quartz and feldspar grains used by such methods, they also present several drawbacks such as a poor resolution (5-10% uncertainty at one sigma) or parameters that are difficult to handle (e.g. stability of the dose rate over time). Hence, crossing different dating methods can only be of benefit for an improved knowledge of the chronology of Middle Stone Age sites. Here, we intend to apply a new U (Uranium)-series dating methodology on shells. Previous U-series methodologies implied full disintegration of the sample for analysis of the U and Th (Thorium) content. However, in this case, late (post-depositional) input of U and Th could not be avoided, leading either to minimum age estimates or to a complete failure of the dating. More recent developments use standard laser ablation system in order to evaluate the U and Th incorporation (e.g. Sharp et al., 2016) but the dating still rest on modeling of this incorporation. The new methodology that has been developed by our team (collaboration between the IRAMAT-CRP2A, Bordeaux, IPREM-LCABIE, Pau and LSCE, Gif-sur-Yvette, France) takes advantage of the femto-laser ablation system build at the Pau University (Donard et al., 2015; Pecheyran et al., 2017). This laser system allows virtual beam shaping by combining a high repetition rate with a fast galvanometer movement. This is of great interest in order to adjust the apparent laser beam shape to the structure of the sample, striae for instance (Fernandez et al., 2007), while common lasers only allow circular craters at low repetition rate: this results in a much better signal sensitivity (with limits of detection as low as a few attograms, (Donard et al., 2015, Aramendia et al., 2015) and a better spatial resolution (Fernandez et al., 2007). Therefore, the femto-laser ablation system available in Pau university allows: 1) mapping of the U and Th content at high resolution and detecting parts of the shells that have not been polluted by late U and Th incorporations, and 2) reaching the level of sensitivity required for analyzing the very low amount of U and Th present in these parts of the sample. In consequence, no more modeling of U input is theoretically necessary. This laser facility is unique in the world: these analyses can therefore only be conducted in France. The few Achatina snail shell (n = 32) and ostrich eggshell (n = 3) fragments that we are planning to date and for which we are applying for this export permit are small (<2 cm2). Besides, such remains are abundant at the sequence; in other words, their export and partial destruction for analysis will be of no consequence for the general study of the faunal material. references Aramendia, M., Rello, L., Bérail, S., Donnard, A., Pécheyran, C., Resano, M. Direct analysis of dried blood spots by femtosecond-laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Feasibility of split-flow laser ablation for simultaneous trace element and isotopic analysis. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry (2015), 30, 296-309. Donard, A., Pottin A. -C., Pointurier F., and Pécheyran C. Determination of relative rare earth element distributions in very small quantities of uranium ore concentrates using femtosecond UV laser ablation – SF-ICPMS coupling. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry (2015), 30, 2420-2428. Fernandez, B., Claverie, F., Pécheyran, C., Donard, O.F.X., Claverie, F. Direct analysis of solid samples by fs-LA-ICPMS. TrAC - Trends in Analytical Chemistry (2007), 26, 951-966. Grün, R. and Beaumont, P.. Border Cave revisited: a revised ESR chronology. Journal of Human Evolution (2001), 40(6), 467-482. Pecheyran, C., Claverie, F., Tabouret, H., Bareille, G., Grijalba, N., Unceta, N., Bérail, S., Mercier, N., Martin, L., Tribolo, C., Daverat, F., Garnier, D. L’ablation Laser ICPMS: de l’élémentaire à l’isotopie, de l’environnement à la lutte contre la contrefaçon, des premières expressions artistiques de l’homme moderne à la poésie contemporaine. Journée IPGP consacrée aux développements de la mesure Isotopique. 28 avril 2017, Paris. Porraz G., Val, A., Dayet, L., de la Peña, P., Douze, K., Miller, C.E., Murungi, M.L., Tribolo C, Schmid VC, Sievers C. Bushman Rock Shelter (Limpopo, South Africa): A perspective from the edge of the Highveld. The South African Archaeological Bulletin (2015), 70, 166-179. Sharp ,W., Fylstra, N.D., Tryon, C.A., Faith, J.T., Peppe, D.J. U-Th burial dating of ostrich eggshell: A new geochronometer for African archaeological sites. Quaternary International (2016), 404, 198-199.

ApplicationDate: 

Wednesday, June 21, 2017 - 15:52

CaseID: 

11231

OtherReferences: 

ReferenceList: 

CitationReferenceType
Donard, A., Pottin A. -C., Pointurier F., and Pécheyran C. Determination of relative rare earth element distributions in very small quantities of uranium ore concentrates using femtosecond UV laser ablation – SF-ICPMS coupling. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry (2015), 30, 2420-2428.
Pecheyran, C., Claverie, F., Tabouret, H., Bareille, G., Grijalba, N., Unceta, N., Bérail, S., Mercier, N., Martin, L., Tribolo, C., Daverat, F., Garnier, D. L’ablation Laser ICPMS: de l’élémentaire à l’isotopie, de l’environnement à la lutte contre la contrefaçon, des premières expressions artistiques de l’homme moderne à la poésie contemporaine. Journée IPGP consacrée aux développements de la mesure Isotopique. 28 avril 2017, Paris.
Porraz G., Val, A., Dayet, L., de la Peña, P., Douze, K., Miller, C.E., Murungi, M.L., Tribolo C, Schmid VC, Sievers C. Bushman Rock Shelter (Limpopo, South Africa): A perspective from the edge of the Highveld. The South African Archaeological Bulletin (2015), 70, 166-179.
AdditionalDocuments
  1. Image icon Sample 34_inf view.JPG
  2. Image icon Sample 34_sup view.JPG
  3. Image icon Sample 35_inf view.JPG
  4. Image icon Sample 35_sup view.JPG
  5. Image icon Samplw 26_inf view.JPG
  6. Image icon Sample 1_inf view.JPG
  7. Image icon Sample 1_sup view.JPG
  8. Image icon Sample 2_inf view.JPG
  9. Image icon Sample 2_sup view.JPG
  10. Image icon Sample 3_inf view.JPG
  11. Image icon Sample 3_sup view.JPG
  12. Image icon Sample 4_inf view.JPG
  13. Image icon Sample 4_sup view.JPG
  14. Image icon Sample 5_inf view.JPG
  15. Image icon Sample 5_sup view.JPG
  16. Image icon Sample 6_inf view.JPG
  17. Image icon Sample 6_sup view.JPG
  18. Image icon Sample 7_inf view.JPG
  19. Image icon Sample 7_sup view.JPG
  20. Image icon Sample 8_inf view.JPG
  21. Image icon Sample 8_sup view.JPG
  22. Image icon Sample 9_inf view.JPG
  23. Image icon Sample 9_sup view.JPG
  24. Image icon Sample 10_inf view.JPG
  25. Image icon Sample 10_sup view.JPG
  26. Image icon Sample 11_inf view.JPG
  27. Image icon Sample 11_sup view.JPG
  28. Image icon Sample 12_inf view.JPG
  29. Image icon Sample 12_sup view.JPG
  30. Image icon Sample 13_inf view.JPG
  31. Image icon Sample 13_sup view.JPG
  32. Image icon Sample 14_inf view.JPG
  33. Image icon Sample 14_sup view.JPG
  34. Image icon Sample 15_inf view.JPG
  35. Image icon Sample 15_sup view.JPG
  36. Image icon Sample 16_inf view.JPG
  37. Image icon Sample 16_sup view.JPG
  38. Image icon Sample 17_inf view.JPG
  39. Image icon Sample 17_sup view.JPG
  40. Image icon Sample 18_inf view.JPG
  41. Image icon Sample 18_sup view.JPG
  42. Image icon Sample 19_inf view.JPG
  43. Image icon Sample 19_sup view.JPG
  44. Image icon Sample 20_inf view.JPG
  45. Image icon Sample 20_sup view.JPG
  46. Image icon Sample 21_inf view.JPG
  47. Image icon Sample 21_sup view.JPG
  48. Image icon Sample 22_inf view.JPG
  49. Image icon Sample 22_sup view.JPG
  50. Image icon Sample 23_inf view.JPG
  51. Image icon Sample 23_sup view.JPG
  52. Image icon Sample 24_inf view.JPG
  53. Image icon Sample 24_sup view.JPG
  54. Image icon Sample 25_inf view.JPG
  55. Image icon Sample 25_sup view.JPG
  56. Image icon Sample 26_sup view.JPG
  57. Image icon Sample 27_inf view.JPG
  58. Image icon Sample 27_sup view.JPG
  59. Image icon Sample 28_sup view.JPG
  60. Image icon Sample 29_inf view.JPG
  61. Image icon Sample 29_sup view.JPG
  62. Image icon Sample 30_inf view.JPG
  63. Image icon Sample 30_sup view.JPG
  64. Image icon Sample 31_inf view.JPG
  65. Image icon Sample 31_sup view.JPG
  66. Image icon Sample 32_sup view.JPG
  67. Image icon Sample 33_inf view.JPG
  68. Image icon Sample 33_sup view.JPG
  69. File BRS Shell sample for export permit.xlsx
 
 

Search form