Heritage Cases

THIS IS THE ARCHIVE FOR SAHRIS 1.0


THIS SITE IS NOW AN ARCHIVE AND IS NOT SUITABLE FOR MAKING APPLICATIONS

Please be aware that no content and application creation or changes to information on this version of SAHRIS will be retained.

To make applications or utilise SAHRIS for the creation of information, please use the new site:

https://sahris.org.za

Changes to SAHRIS!

The South African Heritage Resources Information System (SAHRIS) has undergone a generational upgrade and restructure. These changes to the site include, but are not limited to:

  • A new & modernised look and layout
  • Improved site usage flows with respect to applications and content creation
  • Improved site performance and stability

Launch for the new version of SAHRIS occurred on Monday the 30th of October 2023.

The new site can be found here:

SAHRIS | SAHRIS

SAHRA Application Closure

Please note the following concerning applications submitted to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA) during the December 2023 to January 2024 period.

The full notice is available here: Notice

Special Notice

Following comments received on the proposed Revised Schedule of Fees for applications made to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA), made in terms of Section 25(2)(l) of the National Heritage Resources Act No. 25 of 1999 (NHRA) and published in the Government Gazette of 22 July 2022, SAHRA hereby publishes the final Revised Schedule of Fees for Applications made to SAHRA. Applications for provision of services submitted to the South African Heritage Resources Authority (SAHRA), in terms of the National Heritage Resources Act, No. 25 of 1999 (NHRA) must be accompanied by a payment of the appropriate fee, taking effect from 1 January 2023

Revised Schedule of Fees for Applications made to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA)

Cave of Hearths_ESR

CaseViews

CaseHeader

HeritageAuthority(s): 

Case Type: 

ProposalDescription: 

The Cave of Hearths (CoH), located in the Makapan Valley in the Limpopo Province close to the modern town of Mokopane, has long been an influential site to trace the evolution of hominins in southern Africa (Mason 1969; 1988, McNabb and Sinclair 2009). Apart from some earlier investigations, excavations were initiated in the 1940s and continued into the 1950s (Mason 1969). The CoH yielded in situ Acheulian (Early Stone Age; ESA) occupation in Beds 1 to 3. The ESA beds have been dated to between 780 000 and 500 000 years ago using palaeo-magnetism dating (Herries and Latham 2009). The CoH also has an extensive Middle Stone Age (MSA) occupation, found in Beds 4 to 9. The presence of lithics from the Pietersburg Industry places the MSA at the CoH in the MSA I and II, dating to between 128 000 and 75 000 (Wurz 2013). The site also has Later Stone Age (LSA), Iron Age and historical occupations in Beds 10 and 11. The presence of Oakhurst-style lithics in the LSA bed suggest an age between 12 000 and 7000 years ago (Lombard et al. 2012), and the ceramic style may suggest an occupation during the Early Iron Age (AD 400 – 900, Huffman 2007). The material from the surface likely relates to the siege of 1854 (Mason 1969, 1988). Few archaeological sites in South Africa have such an extensive and successive occupations by hominins over millennia. The earlier radiocarbon dates (Mason 1969) vastly underestimated the time depth of the occupations, and these dates are no longer accepted (cf. Wadley 2015). The imprecise dating of the CoH beds remains a serious constraint. Despite the site’s importance in earlier discussions on the evolution of hominins in South Africa, it has largely been excluded from archaeological debates on the ESA and MSA in particular due to the imprecise dating (Wadley 2015). At many other sites, each time period show variation in terms of material culture, and without more precise dates, the artefacts (fauna, lithics, human remains, ceramics, bone tools, etc) from the CoH remain limited in their study-potential. Moreover, due to the lack of precise dating, little remains known about the palaeoenvironment of the Makapan Valley. For example, there are indications that the rainfall was higher during certain times in the past. The presence of lechwe (Kobus leche) in Beds 7 and 9 indicate that during the MSA, much higher rainfall were experienced in the region (Maloka 2021). Bed 5 also contains waterworn lithics, which may suggest a wetter time (Mason 1988). However, it is currently impossible to reconstruct the palaeoenvironment in more detail due to the lack of precise dates. With my collaborators from the University of York (UK), we have already been given permission to sample zebra teeth from each bed for amino-acid racemization dating. We are waiting for the results of this analysis. This is a new method that are being applied, and with this proposal, I am proposing to obtain additional dates for the CoH. For this project, I am requesting to sample breccia that Mason collected for ESR dating. I am requesting to use 2 blocks of breccia from the CoH for electron spin resonance (ESR) dating. For this purpose, teeth and attached breccias are required. This dating technique is not available in South Africa. These specimens will be send to CENIEH in Spain, a commercial ESR dating facility, and returned to the collection after dating.

Expanded_Motivation: 

The specimens will be send via courier to Spain. I am requesting to use 2 blocks of breccia from the CoH for electron spin resonance (ESR) dating. For this purpose, teeth and attached breccias are required. ESR dating is classified within the group of paleodosimetric methods, which are based on the detection and quantification of the defects generated and accumulated as a result of natural radioactivity. The sample is considered as a dosimeter which can register and, subsequently, restore the dose absorbed during its exposure to natural radioactivity. This ionizing radiation (gamma and cosmic rays, alpha and beta particles) leads to movements within the electronic structure of minerals, and some electrical charges become trapped in the crystal defects of the mineral, forming an entity known as paramagnetic center. These centers produce a signal that can be detected through ESR spectrometry. The amount of trapped charges (equivalent dose; DE) is directly related to the dose of radiation absorbed by the sample which, in turn, depends on the intensity of the radiation (dose rate; D) and on the duration (time; T) of the exposure to radioactivity. In the case of a dose rate that is constant over time, the ESR age (T) is calculated by the following equation: DE expressed in Gray (Gy) and D expressed in µGy/a or Gy/ka

ApplicationDate: 

Thursday, May 11, 2023 - 10:29

CaseID: 

21276

OtherReferences: 

ReferenceList: 

Images
AdditionalDocuments
 
 

Search form