Heritage Cases

THIS IS THE ARCHIVE FOR SAHRIS 1.0


THIS SITE IS NOW AN ARCHIVE AND IS NOT SUITABLE FOR MAKING APPLICATIONS

Please be aware that no content and application creation or changes to information on this version of SAHRIS will be retained.

To make applications or utilise SAHRIS for the creation of information, please use the new site:

https://sahris.org.za

Changes to SAHRIS!

The South African Heritage Resources Information System (SAHRIS) has undergone a generational upgrade and restructure. These changes to the site include, but are not limited to:

  • A new & modernised look and layout
  • Improved site usage flows with respect to applications and content creation
  • Improved site performance and stability

Launch for the new version of SAHRIS occurred on Monday the 30th of October 2023.

The new site can be found here:

SAHRIS | SAHRIS

SAHRA Application Closure

Please note the following concerning applications submitted to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA) during the December 2023 to January 2024 period.

The full notice is available here: Notice

Special Notice

Following comments received on the proposed Revised Schedule of Fees for applications made to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA), made in terms of Section 25(2)(l) of the National Heritage Resources Act No. 25 of 1999 (NHRA) and published in the Government Gazette of 22 July 2022, SAHRA hereby publishes the final Revised Schedule of Fees for Applications made to SAHRA. Applications for provision of services submitted to the South African Heritage Resources Authority (SAHRA), in terms of the National Heritage Resources Act, No. 25 of 1999 (NHRA) must be accompanied by a payment of the appropriate fee, taking effect from 1 January 2023

Revised Schedule of Fees for Applications made to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA)

Conservation Intervention: Sutherland Footprints

CaseViews

CaseHeader

HeritageAuthority(s): 

Case Type: 

ProposalDescription: 

Proposed conservation interventions for the preservation of rare and fragile footprints situated within a municipal quarry just outside of Sutherland, Northern Cape

Expanded_Motivation: 

Of immediate concern is the obvious destruction of up to 40% of the site. It is unclear whether this portion of the site was destroyed by human intervention or by erosion. It seems likely due to human intervention since there was not enough loose material in the area to justify erosion. As far as we know the weather in the area has been fair in the two weeks between site visits and as such, it is difficult to explainthe destruction through erosion. It also appears that the damage was too selective to be due to erosion. In either case, immediate conservation interventions are required for the preservation of this significant site.

ApplicationDate: 

Thursday, March 27, 2014 - 14:50

CaseID: 

5210

OtherReferences: 

ReferenceList: 

 
 

Search form