Heritage Cases

THIS IS THE ARCHIVE FOR SAHRIS 1.0


THIS SITE IS NOW AN ARCHIVE AND IS NOT SUITABLE FOR MAKING APPLICATIONS

Please be aware that no content and application creation or changes to information on this version of SAHRIS will be retained.

To make applications or utilise SAHRIS for the creation of information, please use the new site:

https://sahris.org.za

Changes to SAHRIS!

The South African Heritage Resources Information System (SAHRIS) has undergone a generational upgrade and restructure. These changes to the site include, but are not limited to:

  • A new & modernised look and layout
  • Improved site usage flows with respect to applications and content creation
  • Improved site performance and stability

Launch for the new version of SAHRIS occurred on Monday the 30th of October 2023.

The new site can be found here:

SAHRIS | SAHRIS

SAHRA Application Closure

Please note the following concerning applications submitted to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA) during the December 2023 to January 2024 period.

The full notice is available here: Notice

Special Notice

Following comments received on the proposed Revised Schedule of Fees for applications made to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA), made in terms of Section 25(2)(l) of the National Heritage Resources Act No. 25 of 1999 (NHRA) and published in the Government Gazette of 22 July 2022, SAHRA hereby publishes the final Revised Schedule of Fees for Applications made to SAHRA. Applications for provision of services submitted to the South African Heritage Resources Authority (SAHRA), in terms of the National Heritage Resources Act, No. 25 of 1999 (NHRA) must be accompanied by a payment of the appropriate fee, taking effect from 1 January 2023

Revised Schedule of Fees for Applications made to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA)

Dummy Case - Camden Ash Dam Grave Relocation (Training case)

CaseViews

CaseHeader

Status: 

HeritageAuthority(s): 

Case Type: 

ProposalDescription: 

33 Burial sites were identified on the proposed site for the Camden Ash Disposal Dam at the Camden Power Station. Due to the nature of the development the developer has no option but to relocate the graves. The site is close to Ermelo, Mpumalanga Province.The site will be excavated and as a result the graves will be damaged. It is proposed that the graves are relocated under a permit issued by SAHRA. A comprehensive public participation process was performed to identify possible next of kin. No families came forward during this process. Public consultation included advertisements in two print newspapers, the distribution of flyers in the surrounding areas, announcements on the local radio station and community meetings. The report attached to this application gives a detailed account of the process. although a maximum of 33 surface grave coverings were documented it is possible that unmarked graves could be encountered. It is requested that the applied for permit include any unmarked grave encountered during the excavation process.

Expanded_Motivation: 

Phase 2 Relocation process The above case has reference. The proposed site of the Camden Ash Disposal Facility showed surface indications during a survey of 33 graves. These were indicated by stone cairns and in some cases possible headstones. As a result an application for a permit for relocation was logged with SAHRA and the subsequent permit (2121) was received on 4 November 2015, which made provision for the relocation of 50 graves. During November 2015 excavations were initiated on site. As part of the exhumation process, exploratory trenches were excavated across the burial areas to determine the possible occurrence of unmarked graves within the vicinity of the marked graves. As a result of these investigative trenches being dug a total 45 graves (33 known and 12 unmarked graves) were relocated from the Camden site. Since unmarked graves now constituted over 36% of the total graves uncovered it is highly possible that further unmarked graves could be encountered during the earthmoving phase of the project. The area has undergone severe alteration in the past as a result of agricultural activities and it is not unlikely that further graves could be found where no surface indicators are present. Taking the size of the proposed development into account and the areas to be disturbed it is possible that more than the 5 contingency graves could be encountered. It is therefore requested that the new permit make provision for up to 100 graves to be relocated under it. All possible effort was made to identify any further surface indicators and none were found. It would be detrimental to the development schedule if more than 5 graves were to be discovered and the permit application was to hold up the development.

ApplicationDate: 

Thursday, March 30, 2017 - 16:02

CaseID: 

10864

OtherReferences: 

ReferenceList: 

 
 

Search form