Heritage Cases

THIS IS THE ARCHIVE FOR SAHRIS 1.0


THIS SITE IS NOW AN ARCHIVE AND IS NOT SUITABLE FOR MAKING APPLICATIONS

Please be aware that no content and application creation or changes to information on this version of SAHRIS will be retained.

To make applications or utilise SAHRIS for the creation of information, please use the new site:

https://sahris.org.za

Changes to SAHRIS!

The South African Heritage Resources Information System (SAHRIS) has undergone a generational upgrade and restructure. These changes to the site include, but are not limited to:

  • A new & modernised look and layout
  • Improved site usage flows with respect to applications and content creation
  • Improved site performance and stability

Launch for the new version of SAHRIS occurred on Monday the 30th of October 2023.

The new site can be found here:

SAHRIS | SAHRIS

SAHRA Application Closure

Please note the following concerning applications submitted to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA) during the December 2023 to January 2024 period.

The full notice is available here: Notice

Special Notice

Following comments received on the proposed Revised Schedule of Fees for applications made to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA), made in terms of Section 25(2)(l) of the National Heritage Resources Act No. 25 of 1999 (NHRA) and published in the Government Gazette of 22 July 2022, SAHRA hereby publishes the final Revised Schedule of Fees for Applications made to SAHRA. Applications for provision of services submitted to the South African Heritage Resources Authority (SAHRA), in terms of the National Heritage Resources Act, No. 25 of 1999 (NHRA) must be accompanied by a payment of the appropriate fee, taking effect from 1 January 2023

Revised Schedule of Fees for Applications made to the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA)

Export of cryptotephra samples from Boomplaas Cave for the purpose of testing age model

CaseViews

CaseHeader

HeritageAuthority(s): 

Case Type: 

ProposalDescription: 

We propose to export 170 sediment samples from the archaeological site Boomplaas (BPA) to the United States for the purpose of cryptotephra analysis. The goal of the analysis is to accurately identify cryptotephra (or microscopic volcanic glass shards) from distal eruptions which can be used to precisely link the deposits with neighboring sites (e.g., Vleesbaai Area B, Pinnacle Point 5-6) as well as provide age estimates. This project is taking place at ERF 30/33, Boomplaas, Cango Valley, Eden District, Western Cape (HWC permit case number 18021501AS0223E).

Expanded_Motivation: 

We are applying for an export permit to undertake further cryptotephra dating of samples from Boomplaas (BPA) Cave. We recently identified cryptotephra from the Youngest Toba Tuff (YTT), an eruption dating to 74 ka, at Vleesbaai Area B (VBB) (Smith et al., 2018). With this discovery, we were able to tightly correlate deposits from VBB and Pinnacle Point 5-6, a neighboring site along the coast. The YTT and other younger eruptions have also been successfully identified at various other sites in the region, demonstrating the widespread nature of these deposits throughout South Africa and the potential to use this technique to precisely date and link archaeological sites throughout the region. BPA is an important site to study because it is located along the northern margin of the Little Karoo Basin within a year-round rainfall regime and can provide insight into how environmental change in this rainfall regime may have influenced past populations, specifically during the Middle Stone Age-Later Stone Age transition. The deposits date back to 80 ka; however, the chronology mainly relies on radiocarbon dating which is inconclusive for deposits > 40 ka (Pargeter et al., 2018). Pargeter et al. (2018) redated Boomplaas’ deposits using radiocarbon dating of charcoal assemblages from Hilary Deacon’s excavations, however, this study solely focused on the late Pleistocene deposits. Currently, there is no other dating method establishing the chronology at this site. However, it is suspected that the deposits extend back to 80 ka, if not older, due to the presence of Howieson’s Poort near the base and the extrapolation of the radiocarbon dates (Pargeter et al., 2018). Regardless, there is no other dating method to independently verify these hypotheses. Therefore, for this project, we propose to sample BPA for cryptotephra so we can more accurately place it on a reliable and comparable timeline with surrounding sites. Additionally, we will use cryptotephra to test the current age model that has been established using radiocarbon dating. Samples necessary for this project only consist of sediment. No archaeological material was included. All samples were piece-plotted and recorded. Samples will be analyzed by the Sediment and TEphra Preparation (STEP) Laboratory at Arizona State University (ASU) and the Cryptotephra Laboratory for Archaeological and Geological Research (CLAGR) at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV). We are undertaking this project in collaboration with Dr. Eugene Smith, manager of cryptotephra lab at UNLV.

ApplicationDate: 

Tuesday, May 17, 2022 - 15:23

CaseID: 

18599

OtherReferences: 

ReferenceList: 

CitationReferenceTypeDate Retrieved
Pargeter, J., Loftus, E., Mackay, A., Mitchell, P., Stewart, B., 2018. New ages from Boomplaas Cave, South Africa, provide increased resolution on late/terminal Pleistocene human behavioural variability. Azania 53, 156–184. doi:10.1080/0067270X.2018.1436740
Tuesday, May 17, 2022
Smith, E.I., Jacobs, Z., Johnsen, R., Ren, M., Fisher, E.C., Oestmo, S., Wilkins, J., Harris, J.A., Karkanas, P., Fitch, S., Ciravolo, A., Keenan, D., Cleghorn, N., Lane, C.S., Matthews, T., Marean, C.W., 2018. Humans thrived in South Africa through the Toba eruption about 74,000 years ago. Nature 555, 511–515. doi:10.1038/nature25967
Tuesday, May 17, 2022
Images
 
 

Search form