Please note that the report labeled jksjdkj has not taken the survey of sakdjkasj into account.
jenna.lavin
12/03/2012 - 17:11
A site visit was conducted on Friday 12 April 2011. No monitors were present on the site and this has led to the degradation of the slope overlooking the monument. The ECO must be contacted in future before approvals can be granted for work on the XYZ site.
Another issue brought to our attention was the amount of time spent on dkfjskldjfklsd/
dsfkljksldjfklsjdf
sdfklsdjlkfjlksdjlkfjklsdjklf jsdlkj flkjsd kfhdjkg
dsgfsdjghdfjk gkjdhf g
df
gdfklg dfh gjhdfjkgh lkdjfsh gkjdhfgjkd
nicwiltshire
16/05/2012 - 15:39
I would llike to bring to attention jdkasldjlkasj
asdjklasjldkla
\asdjkasd
nicwiltshire
18/05/2012 - 11:01
This application does not comply with Lupo - see the attached doc with 1984 zoning scheme.
nicwiltshire
18/05/2012 - 11:01
This application does not comply with Lupo - see the attached doc with 1984 zoning scheme.
nicwiltshire
23/05/2012 - 11:19
I do not agree with issuing this permit as enough research has been done on the subject. See Human (2011) and Schutte (2009) where they discuss the various issues.
nicwiltshire
28/05/2012 - 11:41
The line barriers exceed the regulations in terms of section 48(7). Recommend that these are adjusted to 6m.
Initiated by: Anonymous on 22/02/2012 - 15:24
SAHRIS Link: www.sahra.org.za/cases/amoila-golf-course-estate-langebaan-demo-case
Initiated by: mariagrazia.galimberti on 04/06/2012 - 11:41
SAHRIS Link: www.sahra.org.za/cases/zandkopsdrift-357-prt-2
Initiated by: mariagrazia.galimberti on 04/06/2012 - 12:03
SAHRIS Link: www.sahra.org.za/cases/red-cap-kouga-power-line
Pages